Also, while we're here, should we be combining Good Omens TV and books if both are nominated or are there significant differences to the new show?

While I wouldn't be fussed either way, I only picked the TV version because gender-presentation-and-play is a lot more present in the show. It's not uncanonical in the book? But the book has Crowley has Crowley briefly disguised as a nanny and a passing comment that angels are agender and not much more. In the TV show it's all over the place in the visual language.

Here's an article discussing, among other things, design choices regarding gender presentation:

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/good-omens-costume-designer-claire-anderson-interview

... By this time, both Aziraphale and Crawley — now Crowley — are wearing turbans and head wraps, which Anderson attributes to “a bit of vanity.” Plus the wrap helps Crowley conceal his snake-like eyes (it’s too soon for glasses). Aziraphale dons a soft leather coat over his tunic, while Crowley wears female attire of the region — an abaya...

Fans who know more about modern fashion than I do, have pointed out that it's a woman's scarf that he has slung around his neck for most of the modern sequences, and women's dark glasses.

And - as of the time I write this comment, there are 162 works in the Genderfluid Crowley tag. (https://archiveofourown.org/tags/Genderfluid%20Crowley%20(Good%20Omens)/works) Which isn't Word of God (some of these might be AUs), but is at least indicative of fan interest.

Any other GO fans want to weigh in?