Previous | Memories | Tell Someone | Next
 
withinadream
withinadream
[femslashex]
23 September 2021 @ 09:07 pm
Nominations Closed + Final Clarifications  
Nominations have closed! If yours haven't been approved, please check the below clarifications. Signups will open no later than Saturday, Sept 25 at 9 pm Eastern.

Marvel
Could the nominators of ships under the fandom "Marvel" please clarify which of our Marvel fandoms they meant these ships to fall under? If no one replies, the ships will be rejected.

The following fandoms have been combined:
  • Private Practice and Grey’s Anatomy have even combined under ‘Grey’s Anatomy’. In future rounds, we’ll have this listed in the Shared Universe list under a broader fandom title.
  • The L word 2004 and Generation Q have been approved under ‘The L Word (2004 and 2019)’

The Adventures of Tom Bombadil
Can Tolkien fans comment on how this should (or shouldn’t) be combined as part of the Hobbit books or with one of the other existing Tolkien tags?

Arrowverse
There are two nominations ("Astra/Alex Danvers" and "Astra/Cat Danvers") for Astra that don’t specify either General Astra or Astra Logue. If we don’t hear back, we will approve as General Astra.

There were several ships containing Zari nominated using the canonical tags, which include both canonical Zaris ("Sara Lance/Ava Sharpe/Zari Tomaz | Zari Tarazi (Arrowverse)", "Sara Lance/Zari Tomaz | Zari Tarazi (Arrowverse)"). Could the nominators clarify which version of Zari they wanted?

Original Work
We are unclear on the intended scope of the following tag: "lesbian who dates men/her best friend who calls her on being stupid though it doesn't stop her". F/M and F/F/M etc. requests may only be included as optional details in this exchange. If the nominator wishes to clarify or reword the tag please let us know, otherwise we will reject.

EDIT: We also need clarification on "Succubus/Incubus" - typically, incubuses are male. Does the nominator have a specified gender for the incubus? We've removed the tag for now but are happy to add back in.
 
34 comments | Leave a comment
 
( Post a new comment )
(Anonymous) on September 25th, 2021 01:42 pm (UTC)
With all respect: what on earth? I'm a new anon here and have no horse in this race but as a longtime participant in this exchange, this feels like a bizarre judgment call. It's your exchange, of course, and therefore your call, but how does "F/F ship where one character has a history of dating men" make the ship less F/F? By that logic wouldn't you have to exclude every character in the tag set who dates, has dated, or has made reference to dating men in canon?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
Lunar: B&tB - [Cat/Tess] all star all girl team[personal profile] shopfront on September 25th, 2021 05:20 pm (UTC)
Women who also date(d) men are definitely welcome in this exchange, we're just trying to find the right line between where this specific tag ends and optional details should begin. It's not something we need to do very often (particularly when most tags are names not descriptions) and hopefully my new response above is clearer, but please let us know if not or if it raises other concerns!
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)
(Anonymous) on September 25th, 2021 08:40 pm (UTC)
I've giving up explaining this. Won't be signing up either. I thought it was obvious I don't want or care about the relationship with a man when it's a femslash exchange.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
withinadream[personal profile] withinadream on September 25th, 2021 08:49 pm (UTC)
I apologize for the poor phrasing on my part! The only things we're trying to avoid are prescribing a) that a character needs to have had past relationships, and b) how a character feels about their past relationships with men. Specifying that someone's made bad decisions in or regrets dating men in the past is something that's a better fit for optional details than the ship tag itself, and if it's the only necessary part of the relationship tag for you, it's a bit too specific for the exchange. Sorry we couldn't come to an agreement!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(Anonymous) on September 25th, 2021 09:28 pm (UTC)
It's an original work tag. How is "is self hating, makes bad choices with men" complicated. If that's not included and it's put into the additional detail it would just be original female character/original female character. It would absolutely not be appropriate to slap "I want this character to have a messy past with men before this relationship which is healing" on "witch/knight" or whatever, because it means that people can't opt in to that mess.

Again, I'm truly baffled that this is an argument. The relationship I want is between two women. The tag is perfectly clear that the relationship is between two women because that's what the "/" between two female characters means. The optional details would be "please feel free to include the men the lesbian has dated in a wider relationship, or even a polyamourous situation with the other woman!" if I wanted that, but I don't. Because the relationship I want is between the two women.
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)
(Anonymous) on September 25th, 2021 11:03 pm (UTC)
Also, the reason I'm frustrated is because we did come to an agreement, you said you were okay with "lesbian who keeps dating men/her female best friend who gets her to stop being stupid" you then changed your mind, which is fine, but your reasoning also excludes approved tags because of implicit men.

Such as:
Conquering Kingslayer General/Newly-Widowed Queen She Marries to Legitimize Her Rule (OW)
Famous Author of Reverse Harem Series/Protagonist Who Is Secretly Bored Of Her LIs (OW)
Mail Order Bride/Her Prospective Husband's Daughter
Noblewoman Entering Arranged Marriage to Man/Courtesan She Buys for the Night Before the Wedding

I no more wanted the man or men involved than these tags do.

But whatever, like I said, not signing up this year.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
Lunar: B&tB - [Cat/Tess] all star all girl team[personal profile] shopfront on September 26th, 2021 12:26 am (UTC)
I'm sorry for that about-face, that's on my misunderstanding. I read your initial explanation and first rewording more from a closeted experience coming to an end angle and once we had more info it no longer seemed like a good fit.

I do however think the scenario you've described requires a lot more and fairly specific non-optional grappling with f/m content and what it means for the character, even if the men themselves are offscreen and the endgame pairing is f/f. A past/boring/future relationship can potentially be addressed briefly within a minimum length gift. As I said, I realise this is a bit splitting hairs but we do think it's a meaningful difference for an exchange that only matches on the f/f part so this is where we'll be drawing a line.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(Anonymous) on September 26th, 2021 12:56 am (UTC)
except I did try to offer solutions that more fit within that line, it's just that the line you are drawing is not remotely clear, with the tags you were offering ignoring the entire premise.

"lesbian who was just broken up with by a man she chose to date/woman she's attracted to" was one of my suggestions, can you explain how this isn't within the scope of what you want?

I was willing to work within your boundaries, it's just that I have no earthly idea what the line you're trying to define is. I was requesting a relationship between two women. one of those women has baggage to do with men, the same can be said of plenty of non-original characters. It doesn't require grapping with f/m content, it requires a female character who is not attracted to men to pursue a relationship with someone she likes. If people did not want to engage with a female character who has that kind of baggage, they don't have to.

it seems like you're trying to prevent people asking for effectively male character & female character 1/female character 2, or male character /female character 1/female character 2 in a tag thus forcing people to include a male character in the exchange, which is not something I was doing any more than the tags I mentioned were.

if it was "lesbian repeatedly abused by men/woman who helps her overcome her trauma" would that be valid? what about "lesbian who married a man/woman she cheats with"?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
Lunar: B&tB - [Cat/Tess] all star all girl team[personal profile] shopfront on September 26th, 2021 07:50 pm (UTC)
There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with that tag but it also doesn’t specify the negative experiences with men that you described. Just that she was dumped by a man. I’m not sure it conveys the bit where she grows and changes in a healing relationship either, hence my second tag suggestion to try and incorporate that more specifically. At the time we were still trying to word a more precise tag for you.

So yes, it fits well enough with keeping optional how/if your creator delves into her experiences with men. If you’re okay with that level of optional detail now then yes, this is fine. Something like this but with additional detail on the f/f side would also be welcome.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(Anonymous) on September 26th, 2021 11:51 pm (UTC)
"lesbian who was just broken up with by a man she chose to date/woman she's attracted to" conveys what I wanted - a lesbian who chose to date a man. because as I said, I was happy to adjust to what you were looking for. But I couldn't work out what that actually was. Please consider looking at your responses, because you really seemed to fixate on things I wasn't saying. I get that you must have missed these comments I made here https://femslashex.dreamwidth.org/83692.html?thread=954604#cmt954604 but even so, I tried to work with you, and all I got back was "no m/f at all ever, what about an idea unrelated to the concept"
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
withinadream[personal profile] withinadream on September 27th, 2021 02:49 am (UTC)
I really do apologize for the miscommunications! Both my comod and I had a difficult time figuring out what the essential parts of the tag were for you, and I'm afraid that's made the conversation needlessly complicated. If you're happy with "lesbian who was just broken up with by a man she chose to date/woman she's attracted to", I can put that in the tagset for you!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(Anonymous) on September 28th, 2021 09:36 pm (UTC)
I appreciate the apology. I was on the fence about participating this year because of other commitments, and I think it's worked out that I really shouldn't, but otherwise I would.
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)